Turn-of-the-month opportunity

December 15, 2014 06:32 AM

One of the most basic time-based trades is buying the Dow Jones Industrial Average or S&P 500 the last two days of the month and selling it on the first or second day of the new month. The trader who introduced this strategy to me called it the “turn-of-the-month trade.” The first four months it was used, it worked every time. It seemed like the best-kept trading secret.

Research followed. This was before 2000, and it was not as simple as it is today. Now, in the age of the Internet, this strategy is more widely known, and variations abound. Some say to buy 10 days before, five days before or three days before, and then sell on the fourth day of the new month. Despite its simplicity, the strategy can be confusing, especially to new traders.

After 15 years of trading at a professional level, the importance of breaking every trade down to a granular level has become self-evident. For long-term and repeatable success, it’s critical to know the exact moment to get in and get out. You want the highest probabilities with quantified data in your favor. 

When Wei Xu and John J. McConnell from Purdue explored this concept in their 2006 paper “Equity returns at the turn of the month,” it sparked new interest in the strategy. Then, Victor Niederhoffer’s coverage of it in his book The Education of a Speculator, particularly with respect to the timing and the probability of the trade, drove home the importance of precision at the time of execution.

Trade logic

This trade makes sense because it corresponds to the timing of monthly cash flows received by pension funds, 401(k) contributions, stock purchase programs, IRA contributions and stock dividends—all of which get reinvested in the stock market.

Using Bloomberg API and Microsoft Excel, you can figure out the exact moment to get into a trade and when to get out based on historical data. In addition, you can identify the months in which you should employ this strategy and when you shouldn’t. A lot of traders use a blanket approach and always stick to the same trade and method. But if you examine the E-mini futures or SPY, you can identify certain months from January 2009 through June 2014 when this strategy works 100% of the time, whereas certain months there is a 17% chance of it working. 

Also, while it may seem insignificant, the difference between your entry and exit strategy is monumental over the long term. Opening imbalances, closing imbalances or Volume-Weighted Average Price (VWAP) orders are important concepts. When someone sends an order in to buy pre-market, they get the opening price. When someone sends in a market-on-close order, they get the closing price. If someone says “buy 100,000 XYZ and VWAP it,” they’re going to have their order slowly bought or sold with the volume throughout the day, and at the end they’ll get the VWAP. 

Running regression analysis on SPY alone, if you were to buy the open four days prior to the end of the month and sell it on the open on the fifth day of the new month, history suggests a 53.86% cumulative return over the study period. Whereas if you used a market-on-close order and bought the close five days prior to the new month and sold your position on the fifth day on the close, you might expect a 66.42% cumulative return, with an average move of 1.02%. The biggest move was 8.73% on November-December 2011, and the biggest loser was 10.27% on July-August 2011 (see “Best & worst,” below).

Find your edge

Our goal is to identify the best edge while risk management remains a top priority. Imagine being in one of the greatest bull markets of our time; if you had the hindsight, you would have been as long as possible. From Jan. 1, 2009, to the end of June 2014, the Russell Index went from 500 to 1188, or from 48.32 to 118.16 in IWM, a 145% return on the equity.

Despite the success of simply being long, you would have had to endure significant ups and downs, and some segments would not have returned as well as others. If you bought FAS (the three-times leverage financial services industry exchange-traded fund) on Jan. 1, 2009, at 70.50 and held it until June 20, 2014, at 99.59, you would have earned just 41% (see “Uncovering returns,” below).

A common criticism of leveraged ETFs is that they don’t deliver superior returns over time. Looking at these numbers, you might think that is correct and that FAS is the worst vehicle for the trade. If you were to use the turn of the month trade on IWM and using the open/close/VWAP approach, the best you would have done is a 71.33% cumulative return from buying the close five days prior to the end of the month and selling on the close on the third day of the new month.

But having the ability to quantify the data with Excel you would see that the best approach would have used FAS on the turn of the month, with a twist. If you went long on the close five days before and sold on the fourth day of the new month, you would have had a 245.21% cumulative return, or a 469% compounded return, and you only would have had to put your money in eight trading days out of the month.

Many sound trade strategies begin with a simple concept, basic but viable. These ideas can produce consistent, typical returns over time. Real success, however, comes from digging into the details, uncovering the specific order entry techniques, markets and precise days of execution to develop a truly powerful approach.

Tim Fligg has been a professional trader for more than 15 years. He is currently a portfolio manager of the John Keeley Asset Management Endowment Fund at DePaul University in Chicago.

About the Author

Tim Fligg has been a professional trader for more than15 years. He has been profiled in Futures and currently is a proprietary trader focusing on equities, options and futures. He most recently put up the highest return ever on real money, 44.7% within three months, on BattleFin 7.0.